| |
Recommending
devotion at twelve o'clock, called in Scripture the
sixth hour of the day. This frequency of devotion
equally desirable by all orders of people. Universal
love is here recommended to be the subject of prayer at
this hour. Of intercession, as an act of universal love.
IT WILL
perhaps be thought by some people, that these hours of
prayer come too thick; that they can only be observed by
people of great leisure, and ought not to be pressed upon
the generality of men, who have the cares of families,
trades, and employments; nor upon the gentry, whose state
and figure in the world cannot admit of this frequency of
devotion. And that it is only fit for monasteries and
nunneries, or such people as have no more to do in the
world than they have.
To this
it is answered,
First,
That this method of devotion is not pressed upon any sort
of people, as absolutely necessary, but recommended to all
people, as the best, the happiest, and most perfect way of
life.
And if a
great and exemplary devotion is as much the greatest
happiness and perfection of a merchant, a soldier, or a
man of quality, as it is the greatest happiness and
perfection of the most retired contemplative life, then it
is as proper to recommend it without any abatements to one
order of men, as to another: because happiness and
perfection are of the same worth and value to all people.
The
gentleman and tradesman may, and must, spend much of their
time differently from the pious monk in the cloister, or
the contemplative hermit in the desert; but then, as the
monk and hermit lose the ends of retirement unless they
make it all serviceable to devotion; so the gentleman and
merchant fail of the greatest ends of a social life, and
live to their loss in the world, unless devotion be their
chief and governing temper.
It is
certainly very honest and creditable for people to engage
in trades and employments; it is reasonable for gentlemen
to manage well their estates and families, and take such
recreations as are proper to their state. But then every
gentleman and tradesman loses the greatest happiness of
his creation, is robbed of something that is greater than
all employments, distinctions, and pleasures of the world,
if he does not live more to piety and devotion than to
anything else in the world.
Here are
therefore no excuses made for men of business and figure
in the world. First, Because it would be to excuse them
from that which is the greatest end of living; and be only
finding so many reasons for making them less beneficial to
themselves and less serviceable to God and the world.
Secondly,
Because most men of business and figure engage too far in
worldly matters; much farther than the reasons of human
life, or the necessities of the world require.
Merchants
and tradesmen, for instance, are generally ten times
farther engaged in business than they need; which is so
far from being a reasonable excuse for their want of time
for devotion, that it is their crime, and must be censured
as a blameable instance of covetousness and ambition.
The
gentry and people of figure either give themselves up to
state employments, or to the gratifications of their
passions, in a life of gaiety and debauchery; and if these
things might be admitted as allowable avocations from
devotion, devotion must be reckoned a poor circumstance of
life.
Unless
gentlemen can show that they have another God than the
Father of our Lord Jesus Christ; another nature than that
which is derived from Adam; another religion than the
Christian; it is in vain to plead their state, and
dignity, and pleasures, as reasons for not preparing their
souls for God, by a strict and regular devotion.
For since
piety and devotion are the common unchangeable means of
saving all the souls in the world that shall be saved,
there is nothing left for the gentleman, the soldier, and
the tradesman, but to take care that their several states
be, by care and watchfulness, by meditation and prayer,
made states of an exact and solid piety.
If a
merchant, having forborne from too great business, that he
might quietly attend on the service of God, should
therefore die worth twenty instead of fifty thousand
pounds, could any one say that he had mistaken his
calling, or gone a loser out of the world?
If a
gentleman should have killed fewer foxes, been less
frequent at balls, gaming, and merry meetings, because
stated parts of his time had been given to retirement, and
meditation, and devotion, could it be thought, that when
he left the world, he would regret the loss of those hours
that he had given to the care and improvement of his soul?
If a
tradesman, by aspiring after Christian perfection, and
retiring himself often from his business, should, instead
of leaving his children fortunes to spend in luxury and
idleness, leave them to live by their own honest labour,
could it be said that he had made a wrong use of the
world, because he had shown his children that he had more
regard to that which is eternal, than to this which is so
soon to be at an end?
Since,
therefore, devotion is not only the best and most
desirable practice in a cloister, but the best and most
desirable practice of men, as men, and in every state of
life; they that desire to be excused from it, because they
are men of figure, and estates, and business, are no wiser
than those that should desire to be excused from health
and happiness, because they were men of figure and
estates.
I cannot
see why every gentleman, merchant, or soldier, should not
put those questions seriously to himself:
What is
the best thing for me to intend and drive at in all my
actions? How shall I do to make the most of human life?
What ways shall I wish that I had taken, when I am leaving
the world?
Now to be
thus wise, and to make thus much use of our reason, seems
to be but a small and necessary piece of wisdom. For how
can we pretend to sense and judgment, if we dare not
seriously consider, and answer, and govern our lives by
that which such questions require of us?
Shall a
nobleman think his birth too high a dignity to condescend
to such questions as these? Or a tradesman think his
business too great, to take any care about himself?
Now here
is desired no more devotion in any one's life, than the
answering these few questions requires.
Any
devotion that is not to the greater advantage of him that
uses it than anything that he can do in the room of it;
any devotion that does not procure an infinitely greater
good than can be got by neglecting it, is freely yielded
up; here is no demand of it.
But if
people will live in so much ignorance, as never to put
these questions to themselves, but push on a blind life at
all chances, in quest of they know not what, nor why;
without ever considering the worth, or value, or tendency
of their actions, without considering what God, reason,
eternity, and their own happiness require of them; it is
for the honour of devotion, that none can neglect it, but
those who are thus inconsiderate, who dare not inquire
after that which is the best, and most worthy of their
choice.
It is
true, Claudius, you are a man of figure and estate, and
are to act the part of such a station in human life; you
are not called, as Elijah was, to be a prophet, or as St.
Paul, to be an Apostle.
But will
you therefore not love yourself? Will you not seek and
study your own happiness, because you are not called to
preach up the same things to other people?
You would
think it very absurd, for a man not to value his own
health, because he was not a physician; nor the
preservation of his limbs because he was not a
bone-setter. Yet it is more absurd for you, Claudius, to
neglect the improvement of your soul in piety, because you
are not an Apostle, or a bishop.
Consider
this text of Scripture: "If ye live after the flesh,
ye shall die; but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the
deeds of the body, ye shall live. For as many as are led
by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God."
[Rom. viii. 13, 14] Do you think that this Scripture does
not equally relate to all mankind? Can you find any
exception here for men of figure and estates? Is not a
spiritual and devout life here made the common condition
on which all men are to become sons of God? Will you leave
hours of prayer, and rules of devotion to particular
states of life, when nothing but the same spirit of
devotion can save you, or any man, from eternal death?
Consider
again this text: "For we must all appear before the
judgment-seat of Christ; that every one may receive the
things done in his body, according to that he hath done,
whether it be good or bad." [2 Cor. v. 10] Now if
your estate would excuse you from appearing before this
judgment-seat, if your figure could protect you from
receiving according to your works, there would be some
pretence for your leaving devotion to other people. But if
you, who are now thus distinguished, must then appear
naked amongst common souls, without any other distinction
from others but such as your virtues or sins give you;
does it not as much concern you, as any prophet or
Apostle, to make the best provision for the best rewards
at that great day?
Again,
consider this doctrine of the Apostle: "For none of
us," that is, of us Christians, "liveth to
himself, and no man dieth to himself. For whether we live,
we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the
Lord. For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and
revived, that He might be Lord both of the dead and
living." [Rom. xiv. 7, 8, 9]
Now are
you, Claudius, excepted out of the doctrine of this text?
Will you, because of your condition, leave it to any
particular sort of people, to live and die unto Christ? If
so, you must leave it to them, to be redeemed by the Death
and Resurrection of Christ. For it is the express doctrine
of the text, that for this end Christ died and rose again,
that none of us should live to himself. It is not that
priests, or Apostles, or monks, or hermits, should live no
longer to themselves; but that none of us, that is, no
Christian of what state soever, should live unto himself.
If,
therefore, there be any instances of piety, any rules of
devotion, which you can neglect, and yet live as truly
unto Christ as if you observed them, this text calls you
to no such devotion. But if you forsake such devotion, as
you yourself know is expected from some particular sorts
of people; such devotion as you know becomes people that
live wholly unto Christ, that aspire after great piety; if
you neglect such devotion for any worldly consideration,
that you may live more to your own temper and taste, more
to the fashions and ways of the world, you forsake the
terms on which all Christians are to receive the benefit
of Christ's Death and Resurrection.
Observe,
farther, how the same doctrine is taught by St. Peter:
"As He which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy
in all manner of conversation." [1 Pet. i. 15]
If,
therefore, Claudius, you are one of those that are here
called, you see what it is that you are called to. It is
not to have so much religion as suits with your temper,
your business, or your pleasures; it is not to a
particular sort of piety, that may be sufficient for
gentlemen of figure and estates; but it is, first, to be
holy, as He which hath called you is holy; secondly, it is
to be thus holy in all manner of conversation; that is, to
carry this spirit and degree of holiness into every port,
and through the whole form of your life.
And the
reason the Apostle immediately gives, why this spirit of
holiness must be the common spirit of Christians, as such,
is very affecting, and such as equally calls upon all
sorts of Christians. "Forasmuch as ye know,"
says he, "that ye were not redeemed with corruptible
things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation .
. . but with the precious blood of Christ," [1 Pet. i.
18, 19]
As if he
had said, Forasmuch as ye know ye were made capable of
this state of holiness, entered into a society with
Christ, and made heirs of His glory, not by any human
means, but by such a mysterious instance of love, as
infinitely exceeds everything that can be thought of in
this world; since God has redeemed you to Himself, and
your own happiness, at so great a price; how base and
shameful must it be, if you do not henceforth devote
yourselves wholly to the glory of God, and become holy, as
He who hath called you is holy!
If,
therefore, Claudius, you consider your figure and estate;
or if, in the words of the text, you consider your gold
and silver, and the corruptible things of this life, as
any reason why you may live to your own humour and fancy,
why you may neglect a life of strict piety and great
devotion; if you think anything in the world can be an
excuse for your not imitating the holiness of Christ in
the whole course and form of your life; you make yourself
as guilty as if you should neglect the holiness of
Christianity, for the sake of picking straws.
For the
greatness of this new state of life, to which we are
called in Christ Jesus, to be forever as the Angels of God
in Heaven, and the greatness of the price by which we are
made capable of this state of glory, has turned everything
that is worldly, temporal, and corruptible, into an equal
littleness; and made it as great baseness and folly, as
great a contempt of the Blood of Christ, to neglect any
degrees of holiness, because you are a man of some estate
and quality, as it would be to neglect it because you had
a fancy to pick straws.
Again;
the same Apostle saith, "Know ye not that your body
is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, and ye
are not your own? For ye are bought with price; therefore
glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are
God's." [1 Cor. vi. 19, 20]
How
poorly, therefore, Claudius, have you read the scripture,
how little do you know of Christianity if you can yet talk
of your estate and condition, as a pretence for a freer
kind of life.
Are you
any more your own, than he that has no state or dignity in
the world? Must mean and little people preserve their
bodies as temples of the Holy Ghost by watching, fasting,
and prayer; but may you indulge yours in idleness, in
lusts, and sensuality, because you have so much rent, or
such a title of distinction? How poor and ignorant are
such thoughts as these!
And yet
you must either think thus, or else acknowledge, that the
holiness of saints, Prophets, and Apostles, is the
holiness that you are to labour after, with all the
diligence and care that you can.
And if
you leave it to others to live in such piety and devotion,
in such self-denial, humility, and temperance, as may
render them able to glorify God in their body, and in
their spirit; you must leave it to them also, to have the
benefit of the Blood of Christ.
Again;
the Apostle saith, "Ye know how we exhorted,
comforted, and charged every one of you, that ye would
walk worthy of God, who hath called you unto His kingdom
and glory." [1 Thess. ii. 11, 12]
You
perhaps, Claudius, have often heard these words, without
ever thinking how much they require of you. And yet you
cannot consider them, without perceiving to what an
imminent[41] state of holiness they call you.
For how
can the holiness of the Christian life be set before you
in higher terms, than when it is represented to you as
walking worthy of God? Can you think of any abatements of
virtue, any neglects of devotion, that are well consistent
with a life that is to be made worthy of God? Can you
suppose that any man walks in this manner, but he that
watches over all his steps, and considers how everything
he does may be done in the spirit of holiness? and yet as
high as these expressions carry this holiness, it is here
plainly made the necessary holiness of all Christians. For
the Apostle does not here exhort his fellow Apostles and
saints to this holiness, but he commands all Christians to
endeavour after it. "We charged," says he,
"every one of you, that ye would walk worthy of God,
who hath called you unto His kingdom and glory."
Again;
St. Peter saith, "If any man speak, let him speak as
the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as
of the ability that God giveth; that God in all things may
be glorified in Jesus Christ." [1 Pet. iv. 11]
Do you
not here, Claudius, plainly perceive your high calling? Is
he that speaketh to have such regard to his words, that he
appear to speak as by the direction of God? Is he that
giveth to take care that he so giveth, that what he
disposeth of may appear to be a gift that he hath of God?
And is all this to be done, that God may be glorified in
all things?
Must it
not then be said, Has any man nobility, dignity of state,
or figure in the world? Let him so use his nobility, or
figure of life, that it may appear he uses these as the
gifts of God, for the greater setting forth of His glory.
Is there now, Claudius, anything forced, or far-fetched in
this conclusion? Is it not the plain sense of the words,
that everything in life is to be made a matter of holiness
unto God? If so, then your estate and dignity is so far
from excusing you from great piety and holiness of life,
that it lays you under a greater necessity of living more
to the glory of God, because you have more of His gifts
that may be made serviceable to it.
For
people, therefore, of figure, or business, or dignity in
the world, to leave great piety and eminent devotion to
any particular orders of men, or such as they think have
little else to do in the world, is to leave the kingdom of
God to them.
For it is
the very end of Christianity to redeem all orders of men
into one holy society, that rich and poor, high and low,
masters and servants, may in one and the same spirit of
piety become "a chosen generation, a royal
priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that are to
show forth the praises of Him who hath called them out of
darkness, into His marvellous light." [1 Pet. ii. 9]
Thus much
being said to show that great devotion and holiness is not
to be left to any particular sort of people, but to be the
common spirit of all that desire to live up to the terms
of common Christianity; I now proceed to consider the
nature and necessity of universal love, which is here
recommended to be the subject of your devotion at this
hour. You are here also called to intercession, as the
most proper exercise to raise and preserve that love.
By
intercession is meant a praying to God, and interceding
with Him for our fellow-creatures.
Our
Blessed Lord hath recommended His love to us, as the
pattern and example of our love to one another. As,
therefore, He is continually making intercession for us
all, so ought we to intercede and pray for one another.
"A
new commandment," saith He, "I give unto you,
That ye love one another, as I have loved you. By this
shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye love
one another." [John xiii. 34, 35]
The
newness of this precept did not consist in this, that men
were commanded to love one another; for this was an old
precept, both of the law of Moses, and of nature. But it
was new in this respect, that it was to imitate a new, and
till then unheard-of example of love; it was to love one
another, as Christ had loved us.
And if
men are to know that we are disciples of Christ, by thus
loving one another, according to His new example of love,
then it is certain, that if we are void of this love, we
make it as plainly known unto men, that we are none of His
disciples.
There is
no principle of the heart that is more acceptable to God,
than an universal fervent love to all mankind, wishing and
praying for their happiness; because there is no principle
of the heart that makes us more like God, who is love and
goodness itself, and created all beings for their
enjoyment of happiness.
The
greatest idea that we can frame of God, is when we
conceive Him to be a Being of infinite love and goodness;
using an infinite wisdom and power, for the common good
and happiness of all His creatures.
The
highest notion, therefore, that we can form of man is when
we conceive him as like to God, in this respect, as he can
be; using all his infinite faculties, whether of wisdom,
power, or prayers, for the common good of all his
fellow-creatures; heartily desiring they may have all the
happiness they are capable of, and as many benefits and
assistances from him, as his state and condition in the
world will permit him to give them.
And on
the other hand, what a baseness and iniquity is there in
all instances of hatred, envy, spite, and ill-will; if we
consider that every instance of them is so far acting in
opposition to God, and intending mischief and harm to
those creatures which God favours, and protects, and
preserves, in order to their happiness! An ill-natured
man, amongst God's creatures, is the most perverse
creature in the world, acting contrary to that love by
which himself subsists, and which alone gives subsistence
to all that variety of beings, that enjoy life in any part
of the creation.
"Whatsoever
ye would that men should do unto you, even so do unto
them." [Matt. vii. 12]
Now,
though this is a doctrine of strict justice, yet it is
only an universal love that can comply with it. For as
love is the measure of our acting towards ourselves, so we
can never act in the same manner towards other people,
till we look upon them with that love, with which we look
upon ourselves.
As we
have no degrees of spite, or envy, or ill-will, to
ourselves, so we cannot be disposed towards others as we
are towards ourselves, till we universally renounce all
instances of spite, and envy, and ill-will, even in the
smallest degrees.
If we had
any imperfection in our eyes, that made us see any one
thing wrong, for the same reason they would show us an
hundred things wrong.
So, if we
have any temper of our hearts, that makes us envious, or
spiteful, or ill-natured towards any one man, the same
temper will make us envious, and spiteful, and ill-natured
towards a great many more.
If,
therefore, we desire this Divine virtue of love we must
exercise and practise our hearts in the love of all
because it is not Christian love, till it is the love of
all.
If a man
could keep this whole law of love, and yet offend in one
point, he would be guilty of all. For as one allowed
instance of injustice destroys the justice of all our
other actions, so one allowed instance of envy, spite, and
ill-will, renders all our other acts of benevolence and
affection nothing worth.
Acts of
love, that proceed not from a principle of universal love,
are but like acts of justice, that proceed from a heart
not disposed to universal justice.
A love
which is not universal, may indeed have tenderness and
affection, but it hath nothing of righteousness or piety
in it: it is but humour, and temper, or interest, or such
a love as publicans and heathens practise.
All
particular envies and spites are as plain departures from
the spirit of Christianity, as any particular acts of
injustice. For it is as much a law of Christ to treat
everybody as your neighbour, and to love your neighbour as
yourself, as it is a law of Christianity to abstain from
theft.
Now the
noblest motive to this universal tenderness and affection
is founded in this doctrine: "God is love, and he
that dwelleth in love, dwelleth in God." [1 John iv.
16]
Who,
therefore, whose heart has any tendency towards God, would
not aspire after this Divine temper, which so changes and
exalts our nature into an union with Him?
How
should we rejoice in the exercise and practice of this
love, which, so often as we feel it, is so often an
assurance to us, that God is in us, that we act according
to His Spirit, who is Love itself! But we must observe,
that love has then only this mighty power of uniting us to
God, when it is so pure and universal as to imitate that
love which God beareth to all His creatures.
God
willeth the happiness of all beings, though it is no
happiness to Himself. Therefore we must desire the
happiness of all beings, though no happiness cometh to us
from it.
God
equally delighteth in the perfections of all His
creatures: therefore we should rejoice in those
perfections, wherever we see them, and be as glad to have
other people perfect as ourselves.
As God
forgiveth all, and giveth grace to all, so we should
forgive all those injuries and affronts which we receive
from others, and do all the good that we can to them.
God
Almighty, besides His own great example of love, which
ought to draw all His creatures after it, has so provided
for us, and made our happiness so common to us all, that
we have no occasion to envy or hate one another.
For we
cannot stand in one another's way, or by enjoying any
particular good, keep another from his full share of it.
As we
cannot be happy but in the enjoyment of God, so we cannot
rival or rob one another of this happiness.
And as to
other things, the enjoyments and prosperities of this
life, they are so little in themselves, so foreign to our
happiness, and, generally speaking, so contrary to that
which they appear to be, that they are no foundation for
envy, or spite, or hatred.
How silly
would it be to envy a man, that was drinking poison out of
a golden cup! And yet who can say that he is acting wiser
than thus, when he is envying any instance of worldly
greatness?
How many
saints has adversity sent to Heaven! And how many poor
sinners has prosperity plunged into everlasting misery! A
man seems then to be in the most glorious state, when he
has conquered, disgraced, and humbled his enemy; though it
may be, that same conquest has saved his adversary and
undone himself.
This man
had perhaps never been debauched, but for his fortune and
advancement; that had never been pious, but through his
poverty and disgrace.
She that
is envied for her beauty, may perchance owe all her misery
to it; and another may be forever happy, for having had no
admirers of her person.
One man
succeeds in everything, and so loses all; another meets
with nothing but crosses and disappointments, and thereby
gains more than all the world is worth.
This
clergyman may be undone by his being made a bishop; and
that may save both himself and others, by being fixed to
his first poor vicarage.
How
envied was Alexander, when, conquering the world, he built
towns, set up his statues, and left marks of his glory in
so many kingdoms!
And how
despised was the poor preacher St. Paul, when he was
beaten with rods! And yet how strangely was the world
mistaken in their judgment! How much to be envied was St.
Paul! How much to be pitied was Alexander!
These few
reflections sufficiently show us, that the different
conditions of this life have nothing in them to excite our
uneasy passions, nothing that can reasonably interrupt our
love and affection to one another.
To
proceed now to another motive to this universal love.
Our power
of doing external acts of love and goodness is often very
narrow and restrained. There are, it may be, but few
people to whom we can contribute any worldly relief.
But
though our outward means of doing good are often thus
limited, yet, if our hearts are but full of love and
goodness, we get, as it were, an infinite power; because
God will attribute to us those good works, those acts of
love, and tender charities, which we sincerely desired,
and would gladly have performed, had it been in our power.
You
cannot heal all the sick, relieve all the poor; you cannot
comfort all in distress, nor be a father to all the
fatherless; you cannot, it may be, deliver many from their
misfortunes, or teach them to find comfort in God.
But if
there is a love and tenderness in your heart, that
delights in these good works, and excites you to do all
that you can: if your love has no bounds, but continually
wishes and prays for the relief and happiness of all that
are in distress; you will be received by God as a
benefactor to those, who have had nothing from you but
your good will, and tender affections.
You
cannot build hospitals for the incurable; you cannot erect
monasteries for the education of persons in holy solitude,
continual prayer, and mortification; but if you join in
your heart with those that do, and thank God for their
pious designs; if you are a friend to these great friends
to mankind, and rejoice in their eminent virtues; you will
be received by God as a sharer of such good works as,
though they had none of your hands, yet had all your
heart.
This
consideration surely is sufficient to make us look to, and
watch over our hearts with all diligence; to study the
improvement of our inward tempers, and aspire after every
height and perfection of a loving, charitable, and
benevolent mind.
And on
the other hand, we may hence learn the great evil and
mischief of all wrong turns of mind, of envy, spite,
hatred, and ill-will. For if the goodness of our hearts
will entitle us to the reward of good actions, which we
never performed; it is certain that the badness of our
hearts, our envy, ill-nature, and hatred, will bring us
under the guilt of actions that we have never committed.
As he
that lusteth after a woman shall be reckoned an adulterer,
though he has only committed the crime in his heart; so
the malicious, spiteful, ill-natured man, that only
secretly rejoices at evil, shall be reckoned a murderer,
though he has shed no blood.
Since,
therefore, our hearts, which are always naked and open to
the eyes of God, give such an exceeding extent and
increase, either to our virtues or vices, it is our best
and greatest business to govern the motions of our hearts,
to watch, correct, and improve the inward state and temper
of our souls.
Now there
is nothing that so much exalts our souls, as this heavenly
love: it cleanses and purifies like a holy fire, and all
ill tempers fall away before it. It makes room for all
virtues, and carries them to their greatest height.
Everything that is good and holy grows out of it, and it
becomes a continual source of all holy desires and pious
practices.
By love,
I do not mean any natural tenderness, which is more or
less in people, according to their constitutions; but I
mean a larger principle of the soul, founded in reason and
piety, which makes us tender, kind, and benevolent to all
our fellow-creatures, as creatures of God, and for His
sake.
It is
this love, that loves all things in God, as His creatures,
as the images of His power, as the creatures of His
goodness, as parts of His family, as members of His
society, that becomes a holy principle of all great and
good actions.
The love,
therefore, of our neighbour, is only a branch of our love
to God. For when we love God with all our hearts, and with
all our souls, and with all our strength, we shall
necessarily love those beings that are so nearly related
to God, that have everything from Him, and are created by
Him to be objects of His own eternal love. If I hate or
despise any one man in the world, I hate something that
God cannot hate, and despise that which He loves.
And can I
think that I love God with all my heart whilst I hate that
which belongs only to God, which has no other master but
Him, which bears His image, is part of His family, and
exists only by the continuance of His love towards it?
It was
the impossibility of this that made St. John say, that
"If any man saith he loveth God, and hateth his
brother, he is a liar." [1 John iv. 20]
These
reasons sufficiently show us, that no love is holy or
religious, till it becomes universal.
For if
religion requires me to love all persons, as God's
creatures, that belong to Him, that bear His image, enjoy
His protection, and make parts of His family and
household; if these are the great and necessary reasons
why I should live in love and friendship with any one man
in the world; they are the same great and necessary
reasons why I should live in love and friendship with
every man in the world; and, consequently, I offend
against all these reasons, and break through all these
ties and obligations, whenever I want love towards any one
man. The sin, therefore, of hating, or despising any one
man, is like the sin of hating all God's creation; and the
necessity of loving any one man, is the same necessity of
loving every man in the world. And though many people may
appear to us ever so sinful, odious, or extravagant in
their conduct, we must never look upon that as the least
motive for any contempt or disregard of them; but look
upon them with the greater compassion, as being in the
most pitiable condition that can be.
As it was
the sins of the world that made the Son of God become a
compassionate suffering Advocate for all mankind, so no
one is of the Spirit of Christ, but he that has the utmost
compassion for sinners. Nor is there any greater sign of
your own perfection, than when you find yourself all love
and compassion towards them that are very weak and
defective. And on the other hand, you have never less
reason to be pleased with yourself, than when you find
yourself most angry and offended at the behaviour of
others. All sin is certainly to be hated and abhorred,
wherever it is; but then we must set ourselves against
sin, as we do against sickness and diseases, by showing
ourselves tender and compassionate to the sick and
diseased.
All other
hatred of sin, which does not fill the heart with the
softest, tenderest affections towards persons miserable in
it, is the servant of sin, at the same time that it seems
to be hating it.
And there
is no temper which even good men ought more carefully to
watch and guard against, than this. For it is a temper
that lurks and hides itself under the mover of many
virtues, and by being unsuspected, does the more mischief.
A man
naturally fancies, that it is his own exceeding love of
virtue that makes him not able to bear with those that
want it. And when he abhors one man, despises another, and
cannot bear the name of a third, he supposes it all to be
a proof of his own high sense of virtue, and just hatred
of sin.
And yet,
one would think, that a man needed no other cure for this
temper, than this one reflection:
That if
this had been the spirit of the Son of God, if He had
hated sin in this manner, there had been no redemption of
the world; that if God had hated sinners in this manner,
day and night, the world itself had ceased long ago.
This,
therefore, we may take for a certain rule, that the more
we partake of the Divine nature, the more improved we are
ourselves; and the higher our sense of virtue is, the more
we shall pity and compassionate those that want it. The
sight of such people will then, instead of raising in us a
haughty contempt, or peevish indignation towards them,
fill us with such bowels of compassion, as when we see the
miseries of an hospital.
That the
follies, therefore, crimes, and ill-behaviour of our
fellow-creatures, may not lessen that love and tenderness
which we are to have for all mankind, we should often
consider the reasons on which the duty of love is founded.
Now we
are to love our neighbour, that is, all mankind, not
because they are wise, holy, virtuous, or well-behaved;
for all mankind neither ever was, nor ever will be so;
therefore it is certain, that the reason of our being
obliged to love them cannot be founded in their virtue.
Again; if
their virtue or goodness were the reason of our being
obliged to love people, we should have no rule to proceed
by; because though some people's virtues or vices are very
notorious, yet, generally speaking, we are but very ill
judges of the virtue and merit of other people.
Thirdly,
We are sure that the virtue or merit of persons is not the
reason of our being obliged to love them, because we are
commanded to pay the highest instances of love to our
worst enemies: we are to love, and bless, and pray for
those that most injuriously treat us. This therefore is
demonstration, that the merit of persons is not the reason
on which our obligation to love them is founded.
Let us
farther consider, what that love is which we owe to our
neighbour. It is to love him as ourselves, that is, to
have all those sentiments towards him which we have
towards ourselves; to wish him everything that we may
lawfully wish to ourselves; to be glad of every good, and
sorry for every evil, that happens to him; and to be ready
to do him all such acts of kindness, as we are always
ready to do to ourselves.
This
love, therefore, you see, is nothing else but a love of
benevolence; it requires nothing of us but such good
wishes, tender affections, and such acts of kindness, as
we show to ourselves.
This is
all the love that we owe to the best of men; and we are
never to want any degree of this love to the worst or most
unreasonable man in the world.
Now what
is the reason why we are to love every man in this manner?
It is answered that our obligation to love all men in this
manner is founded upon many reasons.
First,
Upon a reason of equity; for if it is just to love
ourselves in this manner, it must be unjust to deny any
degree of this love to others, because every man is so
exactly of the same nature, and in the same condition as
ourselves.
If,
therefore, your own crimes and follies do not lessen your
obligation to seek your own good, and wish well to
yourself; neither do the follies and crimes of your
neighbour lessen your obligation to wish and seek the good
of your neighbour.
Another
reason for this love is founded in the authority of God,
who has commanded us to love every man as ourself.
Thirdly,
We are obliged to this love in imitation of God's
goodness, that we may be children of our Father which is
in Heaven, who willeth the happiness of all His creatures,
and maketh His sun to rise on the evil, and on the good.
Fourthly,
Our redemption by Jesus Christ calleth us to the exercise
of this love, who came from Heaven and laid down His life,
out of love to the whole sinful world.
Fifthly,
By the command of our Lord and Saviour, who has required
us to love one another, as he has loved us.
These are
the great, perpetual reasons, on which our obligation to
love all mankind as ourselves is founded.
These
reasons never vary or change, they always continue in the
full force; and therefore equally oblige at all times, and
in regard to all persons.
God loves
us, not because we are wise, and good, and holy, but in
pity to us, because we want this happiness: He loves us,
in order to make us good. Our love, therefore, must take
this course; not looking for, or requiring the merit of
our brethren, but pitying their disorders, and wishing
them all the good that they want and are capable of
receiving.
It
appears now plainly, from what has been said, that the
love which we owe to our brethren, is only a love of
benevolence. Secondly, That this duty of benevolence is
founded upon such reasons as never vary or change, such as
have no dependence upon the qualities of persons. From
whence it follows that it is the same great sin, to want
this love to a bad man, as to want it to a good man.
Because he that denies any of this benevolence to a bad
man, offends against all the same reasons of love, as he
does that denies any benevolence to a good man; and
consequently it is the same sin.
When,
therefore, you let loose any ill-natured passion, either
of hatred or contempt, towards (as you suppose) an ill
man, consider what you would think of another that was
doing the same towards a good man, and be assured that you
are committing the same sin.
You will
perhaps say, How is it possible to love a good and a bad
man in the same degree?
Just as
it is possible to be as just and faithful to a good man,
as to an evil man. Now are you in any difficulty about
performing justice and faithfulness to a bad man? Are you
in any doubts, whether you need be so just and faithful to
him, as you need be to a good man? Now why is it that you
are in no doubt about it? It is because you know that
justice and faithfulness are founded upon reasons that
never vary or change, that have no dependence upon the
merits of men, but are founded in the nature of things, in
the laws of God, and therefore are to be observed with an
equal exactness towards good and bad men.
Now do
but think thus justly of charity or love to your neighbour;
that it is founded upon reasons that vary not, that have
no dependence upon the merits of men, and then you will
find it as possible to perform the same exact charity, as
the same exact justice, to all men, whether good or bad.
You will,
perhaps, farther ask if you are not to have a particular
esteem, veneration, and reverence for good men? It is
answered, Yes. But then this high esteem and veneration is
a thing very different from that love of benevolence which
we owe to our neighbour.
The high
esteem and veneration which you have for a man of eminent
piety, is no act of charity to him -- it is not out of
pity and compassion that you so reverence him, but it is
rather an act of charity to yourself, that such esteem and
veneration may excite you to follow his example.
You may,
and ought to love, like, and approve the life which the
good man leads; but then this is only the loving of
virtue, wherever we see it. And we do not love virtue,
with the love of benevolence, as anything that wants our
good wishes, but as something that is our proper good.
The whole
of the matter is this. The actions which you are to love,
esteem, and admire, are the actions of good and pious men;
but the persons to whom you are to do all the good you
can, in all sorts of kindness and compassion, are all
persons, whether good or bad.
This
distinction betwixt love of benevolence, and esteem or
veneration, is very plain and obvious. And you may,
perhaps, still better see the plainness and necessity of
it, by this following instance.
No man is
to have a high esteem or honour for his own
accomplishments, or behaviour; yet every man is to love
himself, that is, to wish well to himself; therefore this
distinction betwixt love and esteem is not only plain, but
very necessary to be observed.
Again, if
you think it hardly possible to dislike the actions of
unreasonable men, and yet have a true love for them:
consider this with relation to yourself.
It is
very possible, I hope, for you not only to dislike, but to
detest and abhor a great many of your own past actions,
and to accuse yourself of great folly for them. But do you
then lose any of those tender sentiments towards yourself,
which you used to have? Do you then cease to wish well to
yourself? Is not the love of yourself as strong then, as
at any other time?
Now what
is thus possible with relation to ourselves, is in the
same manner possible with relation to others. We may have
the highest good wishes towards them, desiring for them
every good that we desire for ourselves, and yet, at the
same time, dislike their way of life.
To
proceed: all that love which we may justly have for
ourselves, we are, in strict justice, obliged to exercise
towards all other men; and we offend against the great law
of our nature, and the greatest laws of God, when our
tempers towards others are different from those which we
have towards ourselves.
Now that
self-love which is just and reasonable, keeps us
constantly tender, compassionate, and well-affected
towards ourselves: if, therefore, you do not feel these
kind dispositions towards all other people, you may be
assured, that you are not in that state of charity, which
is the very life and soul of Christian piety.
You know
how it hurts you to be made the jest and ridicule of other
people; how it grieves you to be robbed of your
reputation, and deprived of the favourable opinion of your
neighbours; if, therefore, you expose others to scorn and
contempt in any degree; if it pleases you to see or hear
of their frailties and infirmities; or if you are only
loth to conceal their faults; you are so far from loving
such people as yourself, that you may be justly supposed
to have as much hatred for them, as you have love for
yourself. For such tempers are as truly the proper fruits
of hatred, as the contrary tempers are the proper fruits
of love.
And as it
is a certain sign that you love yourself because you are
tender of everything that concerns you; so it is as
certain a sign that you hate your neighbour, when you are
pleased with anything that hurts him.
But now,
if the want of a true and exact charity be so great a
want, that, as St. Paul saith, it renders our greatest
virtues but empty sounds and tinkling cymbals, how highly
does it concern us to study every art, and practise every
method of raising our souls to this state of charity! It
is for this reason that you are here desired not to let
this hour of prayer pass, without a full and solemn
supplication to God, for all the instances of an universal
love and benevolence to all mankind; such daily constant
devotion being the only likely means of preserving you in
such a state of love as is necessary to prove you to be a
true follower of Jesus Christ.
table
of contents
|
|